This is an overview post which allows you to quickly jump to the relevant threads where we are discussing parts of this new governance model proposal. Note that anyone is welcome to propose an alternative governance model in the same way - create a GDoc and write up the model, and then make a paren…

Here are some topics and questions I think would be important to give answer to before proceeding… [image] rcheesley: Note that anyone is welcome to propose an alternative governance model in the same way - create a GDoc and write up the model, and then make a parent post in this category with …

I do not understand why there should be a vote on June,7th… If the resolution is, as you say, to be reached by “consensus” there should be no need for voting. You seem to be contradicting yourself, maybe you don’t understand consensus? Please review the definition of “consensus”, here are some he…

[image] rcheesley: we have decided to break it out into sections so that we can debate and discuss each section and come to a consensus together. Again, who is “we”? I have several times expressed my concern about having to agree on 70 or so different points at once and it not making any sen…

Thanks for the replies folks, just to emphasis that these all came in over a bank holiday weekend where I was not working, so I have only just received the replies. I am going to work through the other threads as well, but to respond to the questions in this thread: [image] Yosu_Cadilla: Why sh…

[image] rcheesley: [image] Yosu_Cadilla: Who is “we”? Doesn’t seem to be explained anywhere in your proposal. The governance working group. lol @rcheesley , you have put there in your doc all the names of whoever participated in the debate, and branded it like if they support your prop…

[image] rcheesley: We discussed in the Governance Working Group the need to time-box discussions because we have a situation where we need to make decisions and get things moving. I believe you referred to it as an ‘emergency’. I defined it as “crisis”, but you said it was too strong of a wor…

[image] rcheesley: We have to move forward as a project, together. Does together mean at your pace or at who’s pace? Usually, the kind thing to do is to move at the pace of whoever is slower, that’s the way if you want to build community… [image] rcheesley: To do this we will all need t…

[image] Yosu_Cadilla: lol @rcheesley , you have put there in your doc all the names of whoever participated in the debate, and branded it like if they support your proposal, this is really not the way… I mentioned in the credits everybody who has been involved to date in discussing and debati…

@ruth, you keep mentioning a figurative deadline we seem to have, but you don’t explain why you think we have it. What is more important than having the right foundation that we need to rush such foundation and risk getting it wrong?

At work I establish alone: assumptions, if needed information is missing; I do mark them as such, at the beginning of the project presentation dead-line, if none is defined persons by name, that are responsible for specific task All these points and more are fixed by me alone and presented on a m…

Governance model proposed by Ruth Cheesley 16/05/2023 - Overview thread - #21 by rcheesley - Governance

Topic		Replies	Views	Activity
16/05/2023 Model Proposal - Section 2, Decision Making Governance community , governance , discussion	11	551	June 21, 2023
16/05/2023 Model Proposal - Section 5, Council Governance community , governance , discussion	9	499	June 21, 2023
16/05/2023 Model Proposal - Section 4, Teams and Working Groups Governance community , governance , discussion	6	447	June 21, 2023
16/05/2023 Model Proposal - Section 1, Membership Governance community , governance , discussion	27	983	June 23, 2023
Mautic Governance Model v2.0 for final review Governance community , governance , discussion	2	450	July 6, 2023

16/05/2023 Model Proposal - Section 2, Decision Making

Governance