Can I think this way?
- Each automation is a “state machine definition”
- Each “box” of the automation is a “state”
- Each pair “automation x contact that enters there” is an instance of that state machine.
- Each contact can “only” be in one “state” for a given state machine.
- A contact may be “inside N state machines” but only once per machine (ie: a contact cannot be twice in the same automation).
Does this match 100% mautics behaviour? Or only 99% and I’m missing nuances?
joeyk
2
Can I think this way?
- Each automation is a “state machine definition”
Yes, each campaign can be understood this way.
- Each “box” of the automation is a “state”
Yes. Kinda.
- Each pair “automation x contact that enters there” is an instance of that state machine.
Yes.
- Each contact can “only” be in one “state” for a given state machine.
No, each conact can be in multiple automations.
- A contact may be “inside N state machines” but only once per machine (ie: a contact cannot be twice in the same automation).
Correct
Does this match 100% mautics behaviour? Or only 99% and I’m missing nuances?
Your questions are really hard to understand, I believe Google translate is the culprit.